RESUMO
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD), anxiety, and sleep disorder (DS) among dentistry students, relating the periods in which they are enrolled.Methods: The study consisted of 90 students: Group 1: 30 first-period students; Group 2: 30 fifth-period students; Group 3: 30 students from the ninth period. The participants responded to the RDC/TMD, Fletcher & Luckett questionnaires, and the Beck Anxiety Inventory to analyze symptoms of TMD, DS, and anxiety.Results: There was an association between TMD, DS, and the period studied. When related to moderate and severe anxiety, the group that had the highest incidence was Group 1 (first period students).Conclusion: The apprehension for what is new can influence the TMD and DS indices, while the greater concern for academic/professional performance can generate higher levels of anxiety.
Assuntos
Transtornos do Sono-Vigília , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular , Ansiedade/complicações , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Odontologia , Humanos , Prevalência , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/complicações , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/epidemiologia , Estudantes , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/complicações , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Objective: Evaluate the bond strength of resin cements to new materials for application in intraradicular posts. Material and Methods: Five materials were evaluated: fiberglass, PET, polyethylene, polyacetal and PTFE. Two commercial resin cements (Rely X U200 and Rely X Arc) were applied on the test specimens of the materials (9x3mm) and the bonding was evaluated through the shear bond strength test, where the chisel operated with a load of 1kN and a velocity of 0.5mm/min at the cement/material interface. The data were analyzed by the Shapiro-Wilk test, followed by the two-way analysis of variance, performed with the Bonferroni post-test (α=0.05). Results: The glass fiber was statistically different from all evaluated materials (p0.05). Comparing the two cements, a statistical difference was found between Rely X U200 and Arc only for the glass fiber (p=0). Conclusion: PET, polyethylene, polyacetal and PTFE exhibited reduced bond strength compared to the glass fiber (AU)
Objetivo: Avaliar a resistência de união de cimentos resinosos a novos materiais para aplicação em pinos intrarradiculares. Material e método: Foram avaliados cinco materiais: fibra de vidro, PET, polietileno, poliacetal e PTFE. Dois cimentos resinosos comerciais (Rely X U200 e Rely X Arc) foram aplicados sobre os corpos de prova dos materias (9x3mm) e a resistência de união foi avaliada através do teste de cisalhamento, onde o cinzel atuou com carga de 1kN e velocidade de 0,5mm/min na interface cimento/material. Verificada a normalidade dos dados através do teste Shapiro-Wilk, foi realizada a análise de variância de dois fatores com pós-teste de Bonferroni (α=0,05). Resultados: a fibra de vidro foi diferente estatisticamtente de todos os materiais avaliados (p0,05). Comparando-se os dois cimentos, foi encontrada diferença estatística entre o Rely X U200 e Arc apenas para a fibra de vidro (p=0). Conclusão: PET, polietileno, poliacetal e PTFE apresentaram resistência de união reduzida comparando-se à fibra de vidro. (AU)